What started it all? The original Porsche Cayenne? What is it with cars that are seemingly, wilfully ugly; designed to shock, to have presence, but not to have grace or easy proportions?
Because it has become a thing. Of recent times, there is the Rolls-Royce Cullinan, the Bentley Bentayga, the McLaren Senna, and now the BMW X7 and McLaren Speedtail. All are designed to make you stop, take stock and go ‘hmm’; but they are not, I don’t think, things that make you go ‘phwoar’.
I’ve come to think this is now deliberate, that the plan with cars like these and others was never to make them great looking in the first place; although if you saw some early sketches of a Rolls Cullinan in profile, with four simple sweeping lines, you might think that in the interim there was a terrible misjudgment.
But it can’t be, can it? The BMW X7 can’t have got to the finished stage without somebody sticking their hand up in the thousands of meetings that must have taken place in the past four years, and saying: “Um, chief. I hesitate to say it but isn’t this, y’know… a bit of a munter?”
The only conclusion I can reach, then, is that perhaps, in an increasingly homogenised and ever-more densely populated world of cars, giving vehicles an outlandish appearance, or caricaturing brand features onto them whether they quite fit or not, is just a way of trying to inject some extra character. It’s a way of making quite sure someone knows exactly what the car is.
Given there’s an element of objectivity to design – and I think it’s fair to say there is, given historically certain proportions have been established as particularly pleasing – maybe if every car company followed established rules, too many cars would look alike. Maybe every GT car would look like an Aston DB9, or it would seem that nobody but Alfa Romeo designed saloon cars.
And given that a big car manufacturer will have more than 20 models in its line-up, perhaps designers have just simply run out of lines, so the only answer left to them is to wilfully bend or break accepted design rules.
In addition to design changing, though, haven’t we changed too? Time was when a manufacturer would reveal an ugly car and it’d get laughed at, and hardly anyone would buy one, and those who did would forever be filled with shame and regret, never again trusted with their judgment: “I might go and look at some new furniture on the way home, darling.” “Please be careful, Keith, remember that time you came home with a Ford Scorpio.”
Join the debate
Add your comment
Beauty is in the Eye of...?
What utter twaddle?, so what we’re saying is Cars look like they are because they’re, the designers, are left with no alternative?, yet we drool over the latest hyper Cars from Aston, Lamborghini, Ferrari, Mercedes-AMG just to name a few, don’t you think it’s us the prospective buyers who drive the designers to give us Cars with Scoops, ducts, winglets, trick suspension?, we’re being told we’re going to need more driving aids, why?, can’t we just drive our Cars?, no , design is part what we want and part designers who by the way conduct clinics with selected owners to gauge their opinions, crash structures in hypercars are usually made with super strong light weight materials, materials than can be moulded to strengthen certain areas, so, if you don’t agree, then that’s fine.
I think also that car design
I think also that car design has become so interlinked with marketing that you rarely see a design that's purely a vision of its creator. Brand is everything now, and it means that only very occasionally does a true 'new design' surface. Designers have innovative ideas, but if you want to get work in a studio you end up producing what product-planning and marketing want.
Bangle's RedSpace - one of the few examples of fresh thinking unencumbered by brand.
You are so right Matt.
There is far too much disgraceful, lazy, inept design around. Sooner or later it will be punished. I'm very glad Matt in particular is giving them a hard time.
It doesn't matter how good the Cullinan is - it is a kitsch pastiche - an embarrassment to Rolls and an insult to their customers, who won't enjoy being laughed at.
If...IF you are a present day
If...IF you are a present day customer of Rolls Royce then by definition you cannot be insulted to own one, or why did you go ahead with the purchase?. You seem quite a spiteful person, one who "laughs" at the choices other random strangers make when car buying. What the heck do YOU know of their reasons and decision making?
Willing to guess that YOU are NOT a RR owner, but simply another jealous, covetous fool who can only lash out at others of greater means than you. What have you spent YOUR own money on?. Perhaps you inhabit a 5 year old city car, given you by your employer, to enable you to peddle your cheap and tacky wares, in your very "own" sales territory. Sure we'd all like to see YOUR cutting edge, new style led car design sketches...go on, put them up and we can all be amazed when auto makers vie for your expertise...sigh.
Sorry if I touched a raw
I think the rest of the Rolls range is rather lovely - it is very specifically the Cullinan that I refer to.
I'm not sure it is reasonable or interesting to speculate as to the means of other readers, nor to denigrate the opinions of all those you decide cannot afford the cars in question.
I have no interest in Matt's ability to afford a Cullinan, but I respect and share his opinion on this subject.
You are of course fully entitled to put a poster of a Cullinan on your bedroom wall if you want to.