Electric supermini shoot-out: Mini Electric vs two rivals

Inside, the Mini has its rivals licked for quality and ambience, the standard car’s impeccable fit and finish enhanced by the neat ‘floating’ instrument cluster sitting ahead of the driver. There’s precious little space, though. Driver and passenger are comfortably catered for but those in the back are cramped due to a rear bench raised to house the battery cells beneath. Access through the gap between the front seats and B-pillar is tight, and the 211-litre boot is no more than vestigial, particularly when full of charging cable.

The Renault’s 338-litre boot is the biggest here, 27 litres up on the e-208, while occupants in the rear get more leg room than in the Mini. What they don’t benefit from is head room, again due to a high-set rear bench forced by the battery under the floor. This extends to the front seats, meaning you’re sitting on rather than in the Zoe. On the flipside, the elevated view makes the Renault the most assured choice in the urban cut and thrust. Quality has improved over the previous versions, but there are still lots of hard and scratchy plastics alongside the new recycled fabrics and improved TFT screens.

Most welcoming is the Peugeot, its body packing the most space for people front and rear (it’s easily the most family-friendly), while the bold dash architecture looks great. The 3D instrument cluster is a particular treat, provided you can see it over the small-diameter steering wheel (some of our testers couldn’t). There are still some below-par plastics to be found, but overall the e-208’s cabin feels classy and sophisticated.

It’s an impression that’s reinforced on the move, at which point the Peugeot makes the most of the unobtrusive benefits of electric power to deliver a smooth and refined driving experience. Our test route took in towns, motorways and some wiggly secondaries, and over all of them the e-208 is calmer than the competition. Its relatively soft suspension smothers bumps, and it’s quiet, with even big impacts issuing little more than a muffled thud from the springs and dampers.

Neither rival can get close to the e-208 in this regard. The Mini matches the Peugeot’s hushed approach yet lacks its suppleness, while its extra firmness causes the car to follow rather than swallow imperfections.

The Zoe isn’t as stiff-legged as the Mini but feels more brittle, with broken surfaces sending shudders through the structure. It’s also noisier, the suspension clonking and crashing in protest over surfaces the other two keep to themselves. It also develops more wind and road noise than the other two, making it the least suited to longer-haul trips.

It’s not the only noise issuing from the Renault, which at low speeds emits a strange Dan Dare-like sci-fi whirring intended to keep pedestrians on their toes. Off the line, the Zoe’s more powerful motor delivers a useful extra turn of speed, and like all electric cars there’s instant urge and, up to around 50mph, the Renault feels warm-hatch quick.

Its regenerative braking is the weakest here, however, as even in B mode there’s not as much retardation as in the e-208 and Mini, which can both be driven effectively as one-pedal cars in day-to-day dicing. The British-built machine’s dash-mounted toggle for accessing the increased brake-energy retardation is more of a faff than the two French machines, which require little more than slotting the gearlever to B.

While it has more power than before, the 1502kg Zoe succumbs to the Peugeot for get-up-and-go. That said, the Peugeot doesn’t feel as quick as the figures suggest, its impressive refinement sapping some of the speed sensations. Switching to Sport takes some resistance out of the throttle pedal for quicker response while raising the top speed to 93mph and rendering the e-208 a demon starter away from the lights.

Neither can match the far more powerful Mini for zest, though. The Cooper S responds to the throttle with an elastic energy that tricks you into thinking the car is lighter than it actually is. Again the linear delivery plays its part here, as does that muscular 199lb ft and lowest-on-test weight. Engaging Sport adds greater sharpness to the throttle, while in all modes the Mini offers greater thrust at higher speeds, continuing to accelerate with reasonable vigour above 60mph – although from here on in it would be shown a dirty pair of tailpipes by the internally combusted model.

The Mini continues to play the entertainer as the roads turn twisty, the Electric version serving up a puppyish up-and-at-’em agility. Curiously, the steering feels lighter than the ICE car, but there’s some feel and it’s as quick as ever. The Mini dives for apexes with the zeal of a bloodhound on the scent, and there’s lots of grip and tight body control, while killing the throttle mid-corner results in a strong tightening of line, enhancing the sense of agility.

The Zoe feels vertiginously high after the Mini, almost SUV-like from behind the wheel. And while the flat seats are fine at a cruise, they offer little support as cornering forces grow. The Zoe clings on harder than you’d think but lifeless steering means it’s not exactly fun, although a lowish centre of gravity and decent body control allow you to scoot through bends with poise and pace.

You feel better located in the lower-slung Peugeot, which on initial acquaintance slices through corners with a familiar French fluidity. If anything the steering, heavier than the Mini’s, is a little too sharp, but it’s precise and there’s decent front-end bite. Push harder and the composure cracks as the softer dampers fail to control bigger body movements and the e-208’s nose ploughs wider, sooner. Lifting the throttle gets things back on track, but neither French car is as adjustable and biddable as the fun-loving Mini. Where the Peugeot and Renault really score over the Cooper S is in their ability to travel further between charges.

Arguably range is even more important on small cars, which are likely to be town-bound where driveways are in short supply, meaning you’ll have to fight it out with others for roadside chargers. Realistically you can knock about 40 miles off the WLTP figures for all of these machines. That drops the Mini’s real-world figure to just north of 100 miles, which is poor compared with the easy 170 miles-plus achievable in the other two.

The Mini’s range lacks the resilience of the others, too. Its miles drop off as you crank up the air-con, switch on headlights or use that extra performance. The French pair are less affected, helping to instil a confidence that you can travel as far as the readout insists that you will. That said, none of our trio likes high cruising speeds, which see the miles tumble from the range faster than they roll under your wheels.

So where does that leave us? Well, matters are complicated by the fact that these are three very different takes on the small EV, each trying to attract a slightly different type of buyer. Plus there’s the thorny subject of price: even in their most basic guises these are expensive superminis, and that’s taking into account the potential ‘fuel’ savings.

The Renault’s range is truly impressive, plus it offers decent practicality. Yet it can’t match the other two for quality, refinement or driver appeal. And it feels less expensively engineered than its pair of rivals, which would be fine if it didn’t cost more than them to buy. Less expensive versions of the Zoe make more sense than this GT Line.

The Cooper S feels like nothing less than a premium product, and for driving fun it’s head and shoulders above the rest, plus at £24,900 for the entry-level model it’s fractionally the most affordable. Yet it’s hamstrung by that range and an interior that is a little too bijou for it to double up as the sort of occasional family transport supermini drivers typically demand – in terms of space it’s more of a Volkswagen e-up rival.

The Peugeot? Well, it’s the most compelling package, striking a neat balance between the practicality and range of the Renault and the quality and refinement of the Mini. No, it’s not the most thrilling to drive, but it features the most even spread of talents and demands far fewer compromises – and for a motoring public getting used to an inevitable EV future, that’s a good thing.

Sub-£30k used alternatives

2019 Hyundai Kona Electric: Our test cars’ budget could also buy you a barely used Hyundai Kona Electric. A whopping 64kWh battery gives the Kona up to 279 miles between plug-ins, which is far more than any of the others here. It’s also good to drive, with punchy performance and a spot-on driving position, and decently equipped.

2014 Tesla Model S: It will be getting on a bit and have around 60,000 miles on the clock, but many will see that as a small price to pay for putting an on-trend Tesla on their driveway. It’s only the 60kWh version but it claims a 208-mile range. Er, reliability might be an issue, though…