National Highways is focusing more on the environment than ever before with the launch of a dedicated environmental division, according to Stephen Elderkin, who was at the start of the year appointed as director of environmental sustainability at the organisation.
Elderkin is well aware of the need for roads, but that they must sit within a wider environmental framework. “There is no question that roads are part of the future of the UK’s transport system and will continue to cater for the vast majority of passenger miles and freight movements. But what is really critical is that we are able to meet that demand in a sustainable way,” he told Autocar in an exclusive interview.
Elderkin heads up a team – that will grow to around 50 people – that is “aligning and coordinating the environmental work that is going on” within the business.
“One of the things that will be a measure of success will be National Highways seeing the environment as an integral part of our deliverables,” he added. “There has always been an importance placed on the environment and I don’t want to discredit the work that has been carried out historically, but I think this is a step on and up in terms of the resourcing and priority going forwards.”
For Autocar Business webinars and podcasts, visit Autocar Business Insight
Prior to taking on the new role, Elderkin – who has been driving an EV for three years - led the team that was responsible for the £1bn A12 upgrade scheme. Before he joined National Highways, he worked at the Department of Energy and Climate Change and Defra, with roles including leading the Government analysis for the Climate Change Act, carbon budgets and energy efficiency policies.
The creation of the team comes after National Highways – which receives five-yearly funding settlements from the central government – last summer released a report outlining a strategy to reduce emissions in the future. As part of the plan, it wants its own operational emissions (for instance, from road lighting, signage and its vehicle fleet) to be net-zero by 2030, road construction and maintenance to be net-zero a decade later, and for all road user emissions to be net-zero by 2050.
“Reducing our corporate footprint is challenging, but achievable and I think we can learn lots from others,” Elderkin said of the first deadline.
However, the other milestone dates may be harder to achieve. “Road user carbon is not something we can deliver alone – we need to be an active and collaborative contributor to get charging infrastructure right.”
“We need to trial and decide on the right technology for low-emission HGVs, and there’s a bit around government policy,” Elderkin said, referring to the ending of new petrol and diesel car sales by 2030.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Two thoughts. First, the people who say we should just stop building roads don't understand the impact of drivecle on energy usage and emissions. Stop start traffic is terrible, even with regen and especially for ICE, which will be around in volume for at least 15 years. Constant speed is good for both. There is then the economic impact - to individuals and to businesses, which adds to inflation - of time wasted in traffic jams. Second point is that road emissions are about much more than tailpipe. The Environment Agency turns up here every quarter to monitor the quality of the water in the river. The technitian told me that this is the first quarter in which road wash ecceeded agricultural wash, largely due to the emission of tyre particulates (due to increasing vehicle weight) increasing more quickly than exhaust particulates are falling. Road drainage therefore needs to incorporate filtration systems to stop this material entering our rivers and streams. They know how to do it, but it's expensive so won't happen without regulations or a swell in public opinion.
@ strider
Fair point made.
Another civil servant living in his own personal bubble. His comment Digital roads amused me....digital roads for analogue users! thats bound to end well.
I can give Elderkin a tip for free - given his comment about emissions created repairing roads....DO THE JOB ONCE (PROPERLY) INSTEAD OD PUDDLING A BIT OF TARMAC INTO A WET BOGGY HOLE WHICH WILL NEED DOING AGAIN WITHIN3-4 MONTHS!
The only person winning out of the current shameful repairs (even if they happen at all), is the contractors who are ripping the Highways off with shoddy work...and therefore robbing (our) taxpayers money.
I am fed up with constant excessive wear and tear on my cars suspension and tyres whilst this fiasco continues unchallenged.