In traditionally distracting fashion, a recent meandering office chat turned to the thorny subject of the best-ever Volkswagen Golf.
A shortlist was duly assembled and it was understandably filled with performance versions spanning the generations: GTIs, Rs, R32s, 16vs, Clubsports et al. Heck, I think someone pushed for the W12-650.
It was a fine list and sparked plenty of debate, although clearly the correct answer is the Mk7.5 GTI. Thanks, no further questions.
But in celebrating the fastest, funnest Golf models to drive, I reckon something is lost. Because regardless of the generation, when it comes to value for money, all-round usability and general agreeability, in my mind the best Golf, the Golfiest Golf, is usually the bog-standard one.
An example might help. A few years back, I ran a pair of Golf Mk8s back to back on our long-term test fleet: an entry-level Life TSI followed by a GTI.
Undoubtedly, the GTI looked sharper outside, was plusher inside (you’ve got to love a bit of tartan) and, on the right road, was sharper and more entertaining. So, overall, which did I enjoy more? Of course it was the entry-level one.
For everyday driving, it was just easier to live with and more relaxing to drive and did pretty much everything you could reasonably want from it, without any real compromise.
The ride was soft enough to tackle any bumps, it was still plenty comfy inside, there was all the kit you needed, it was pleasantly fun to drive and cheaper to buy and run and I was less worried about dinging the alloys.
Join the debate
Add your comment
All depends on your budget I guess, yes, I never saw the point of buying the top model with all the extras that more than half of you'd rarely or never use, or, to have certain options you wanted they were often in two different option packs, I usually opted for mid spec.
But the manufacturers don't want to sell you the low profit sensible model. No they want you to visit the showroom to view the non existent entry car, then sign a credit agreement for the bells-and-whistles GTi with its fancy big wheels and thumping stereo. Why else do they only supply car magazines with the sportiest, most luxurious derivative?
In fairness to Autocar, it's car tests usually quote a "price as tested" so that it is self evident how much extra cost is involved over the affordable base model. But I'd certanly agree that often it's the cheapest version that represent the sweet spot in the manufacturers range probably to satisfy more discerning value conscious fleet customers.