We've long been promised cars of quite different shapes and sizes thanks to the advent of EVs and the skateboard-style architectures on which they're based. But instead we seem to have been treated to a series of slightly taller and visually uninspiring hatchbacks.
The Polestar 3, though, really is something different. In its profile and proportions, I'm struggling to pick a direct rival or even say what it reminds me of. It's a taller estate car but with a sleek body, raised but definitely still sporty. It looks great.
In an office discussion, we once counted more than 50 different categories of car; the Polestar 3 would add another to the list.
The 3 is so called because it's the third model Polestar has launched as a standalone brand. When I've told people I'm getting a 3, they've asked: "Is that the one without the rear window?"
No, that's the 4. The 3 was launched at the same time as the 4. Given that the 4 is smaller than the 3 and the 2 is smaller than the both, it would make more sense if the 3 were called the 4 and the 4 the 3. But Polestar's naming convention for now is sequential, in the order of launch.

The 3 was planned first, and rather than being the one without the rear window, it's the one that's both a sibling to the Volvo EX90 and Polestar's new range-topper. This relationship with the EX90 means the 3 has been launched at the same time as the 4, and with that comes the naming confusion.
Volvo developed the new architecture of both the EX90 and the 3. It was delayed due to complexities in developing the software. When you first get into a 3, you can see why, because the Swedish engineers haven't exactly kept things simple.















Join the debate
Add your comment
Never mind the key etc the efficientcy is horrific. A 111kwh battery running out of steam at 250 miles in warm'ish weather is shockingly bad epecially so as most BEVs are coming in at 15 to 20% less than their WLTP figure.
2.3mpkwh is just not good enough and putting such a huge battery in it to cover it up is not the solution.
Totally agree on the laughable efficiency. Plus the key issues sadly make this one a car to avoid. After 40 years on the road my advice is simple: just get a Tesla!
Good review. it is totally fair to pay so much attention to what is clearly a fundamental design flaw that affects the daily use of the car. One more reason to avoid Polestar and Volvo (I own a 2024 XC40 which regularly drives me crazy and which will not last the usual 8-10 years of ownership that I practice).