Currently reading: JLR cyber attack: production won't restart until 24 Sept at earliest

No new Land Rover cars have been produced since 1 September cyber attack; issues affecting JLR globally

JLR car production will not restart until 24 September at the earliest, the company has confirmed.

The Jaguar and Land Rover maker was targeted by hackers on 1 September and is still in the process of rebuilding its computer systems. The group that hit Marks & Spencer earlier this year has claimed responsibility. 

This has led to production shutdowns at all of JLR's global plants, has created issues with parts ordering and has stifled retailers.

The effect could be costing JLR up to £5 million a day, business economics professor David Bailey told Autocar last week.

Wednesday's news is the first time since the attack that any timescale for a fix has been announced.

A statement read: “Today (Tuesday 16th September) we have informed colleagues, suppliers and partners that we have extended the current pause in our production until Wednesday 24 September.

“We have taken this decision as our forensic investigation of the cyber incident continues, and as we consider the different stages of the controlled restart of our global operations, which will take time.

“We are very sorry for the continued disruption this incident is causing and we will continue to update as the investigation progresses.”

Since the cyber attack, the majority of JLR’s employees have been off work.

It's understood that JLR bosses will meet with ministers today to discuss support measures for its plant workers – which is expected to involve a furlough scheme, similar to that used during the Covid pandemic. This would involve the government subsidising workers' pay while unable to work.

It is thought suppliers will be supported too, as worries are now growing that some could go bankrupt.

Reports over the weekend claimed that some of the firm's suppliers could go bust as a result of the shutdowns.

Former Aston Martin CEO Andy Palmer told the BBC: “I would not be at all surprised to see bankruptcies.” 

Palmer added that many suppliers will soon begin to slim their staff count as a result of the shutdown, saying: “You hold back in the first week or so of a shutdown; you bear those losses. But then you go into the second week, more information becomes available – then you cut hard. So layoffs are either already happening or are being planned."

Back to top

One of those making the call for a furlough scheme is Commons Business and Trade Committee chairman Liam Byrne.

The Labour MP said: "What began in some online systems is now rippling through the supply chain, threatening a cashflow crunch that could turn a short-term shock into long-term harm. We cannot afford to see a cornerstone of our advanced manufacturing base weakened by events beyond its control."

The general secretary of trade union Unite, Sharon Graham, has also called for a furlough scheme.

“Thousands of these workers in JLR's supply chain now find their jobs are under an immediate threat because of the cyber attack," she said. "Ministers need to act fast and introduce a furlough scheme to ensure that vital jobs and skills are not lost while JLR and its supply chain get back on track."

JLR hack: what happened?

Autocar first reported issues affecting JLR on 1 September, when dealers couldn't register new cars on 'new plate day' , traditionally one of the year's busiest for registrations.

In an effort to combat the hack, JLR began “shutting down our systems” on 2 September.

It's still in the process of rebuilding them and is unabel to confirm a timescale for the fix.

Back to top

The hack has left the Jaguar and Land Rover maker crippled. No cars have been produced globally since, leading to millions of pounds of lost income.

The extent of the issues meant JLR brought in police and cybersecurity experts in to “restart our global applications in a controlled and safe manner”.

During this process, which included an investigation, it was discovered that "some data" was "affected", said JLR. Those affected will be contacts, said the firm.

It's not officially known what data was taken or if a ransom demand has been made, but it is thought it most likely involves customer data given the involvement of the police.

Who has claimed responsibility for JLR hack?

On 3 September, a group of hackers calling themselves Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters claimed responsibility for the attack on JLR.

This is the same group that hacked Marks & Spencer in May, causing the British retailer seven weeks of disruption and costing £300 million in lost operating profit.

It claimed to have obtained customer data after exploiting a similar flaw in JLR’s IT system. The claim was made on a Telegram messenger group, where a user linked to the hackers posted a screenshot of what appeared to show JLR's internal system.

A member of the group revealled that a well-known flaw in SAP Netweaver, third-party software used by JLR, was exploited to access the data.

The US's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency warned about the flaw earlier this year. An update for the software was released, but whether JLR applied it is unknown.

It's also not known what data was taken or if a ransom demand has been made of JLR.

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Will Rimell

Will Rimell Autocar
Title: News editor

Will is Autocar's news editor.​ His focus is on setting Autocar's news agenda, interviewing top executives, reporting from car launches, and unearthing exclusives.

As part of his role, he also manages Autocar Business – the brand's B2B platform – and Haymarket's aftermarket publication CAT.

Join the debate

Comments
16
Add a comment…
Peter Cavellini 16 September 2025

If a bunch of keyboard warriors can ring a global company to a standstill, and it seems for as long as they like,then, isn't this something governments should be actively helping because this could effect the global economy and make our lives a bit harder.

scotty5 16 September 2025

Many moons ago, I worked in IT for a merchant bank. Part of my job was contingency planning, the question being how soon can we have our systems up and running after a disaster? That disaster also included loosing our hardware, not just our software and/or comms.

It still amazes me how little money business invests in disaster recovery. If we were able to have at least a functioning system up and running within 24hr all those years ago, it's beyond comprehension why businesses today are being held to ransom for such a length of time. There's no doubt banks today will be under constant attack. How many times have you heard of a bank being brought to ransom?

Is it because their accountants can't see any return on contingency planning, or are they simply taking the gamble that it won't happen to them?

catnip 15 September 2025

Maybe Tata could pay for a supplier furlough scheme? After all, they're going to need those suppliers when things start up again, and Tata are considerably more flush than the British taxpayer.