What is it?
When Land Rover launched the new Defender, it was easy enough to understand why the company majored first on the longer-wheelbase 110 versions, but it was still a disappointment given that, as its own designers have often pointed out, the shorter 90 carries the iconic shape.
Now the 90 has landed at last, held up for a while by Covid and still subject to about a three-month delivery delay, it’s possible to see how different – and similar – it really is to the longer model, about which we’ve already written extensively. It’s quite clearly a modular car: the monocoque chassis, suspension, steering and powertrain packages are all closely related.
The interest lies in the effect carving 20in out of the wheelbase has on stuff like kerb weight, handling and ride, and accommodation – and we took the opportunity to try the new model in P400 mild-hybrid guise, given it’s the highest-performing Defender 90 of all.
The weights are surprisingly close. A shorter model weighs only 65kg less than a similar-spec 110, although that advantage nearly doubles (to 120kg) if your 110 is equipped with third-row seating. Rear accommodation is near-as-dammit identical for space and comfort to a 110’s second row, but the 90’s obvious disadvantage, as a three-door, is that it’s much harder for rear passengers to access and – at least in our privacy-glazed test car – it seemed pretty dark back there. The wide-opening rear door is a boon, though, just as it is on the 110, and carrying capacity is massively larger than the old model’s.
The P400 3.0-litre straight-six petrol twin-turbo engine fitted to our test car makes it the most powerful and fastest-accelerating production Defender available. It turns in a 0-62mph time of 6.0sec, with an accompanying top speed of 120mph. Understandably, perhaps, WLTP combined fuel consumption is unimpressive, at 25mpg, and neither does the Defender 90’s CO2 output – 256g/km – pull up any trees.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Bought by the self obsessed. What possible purpose does this car have that you couldn't do in a Focus?
Its designed for and marketed around a task it will never perform. Instead it'll sit in car parks on tarmac outside pubs. The Evoque and Velar buyers are shallow and vain but at least the car performs a function - luxury. Defender buyers want to think they're Bear Grhylls. £77k to play let's pretend.
Who are we comparing JLR for
Who are we comparing JLR for reliability here to? Jeep and the big German 3 aren't far ahead, in fact I think Jeep is on some models behind. Toyota is way ahead of everyone but it makes undesirable cars e.g the Land Cruiser which no one buys in the UK or the US anymore because it's an outdated car.
I think it is important to look at reliability. But lets also consider desirability. Do you really want to be seen dead in any Japanese branded car these days? Why don't people buy a Lexus? Why is Jeeps off-road capability shunned by UK buyers? When you get down to it people aren't buying on just reliability these days. If they did Tesla would be the worst performing brand in the world!
Really I'd love an article on here regarding why Honda failed (for example). The made reliable cars, but only granddad bought them. See my point here? If we are going to give JLR a bashing on reliability then we'd better attack Japanese brands for being dull
Being dull...
doesn't hit you in your wallet at the end of the warranty period.
And Honda are not considered as just for OAPs outside badge conscious UK, the land of Hyacinth Bucket types who would ruin their finances for the chance of a JLR or Audi on the drive.
Ah but... you are forgetting PCP!
Most German brands are run from new in this country via lease plans and it's the second owner that takes the hit!
Believe me, from experience, German brands are not the paragon of reliability that their marketing machine attests to. By the time the second owner comes along all the glitches have been sorted under warranty, the first owner doesn't give a stuff because it was a company car and not his/her problem
Fair Point Well Made
We have run various makers cars in our fleet.
BMW... Fragile
Citroen Vans.. Do what they say on the tin
Porsche... VW in a posh frock and prone to engine management glitches
Skoda... VW in a cheap frock but more reliable than the Porsche (never understood that one!)
Mercedes E-Klasse... all fart and no poo (as a former colleague once described them!)
I can't imagine many people
I can't imagine many people going for such highly specced Defender 90s, that seems a very niche version to test