Seat Leon X-Perience versus Subaru Outback - comparison

But despite its descent from loftier market territory, the Outback doesn’t trump the Leon on outright power. Both cars offer 2.0-litre turbodiesel engines; both start this exercise with 148bhp to call their own. But it’s the Seat that scores the early lead in the brochure-borne contest – by a full second on 0-62mph acceleration, 10mph on maximum speed, nearly 10mpg on combined fuel economy and 16g/km on CO2.

It’s debatable if such things actually sell crossovers, of course. In real-world, everyday use out on the road – and over mud, gravel and grass – these two cars are separated by some predictable differences.

The Leon is not just smaller, but lighter, leaner and lower. Its dynamic virtues are predominantly those we associate with normal, modern, compact road cars. The Subaru is much more car for the money, as we’ve touched on already - a bigger and more traditional means of family transport. But which covers the other’s territory more consummately?

The Leon’s is the smarter, more modern and more appealing cabin. Seat’s use of materials is more coherent than Subaru’s, and the European firm also better understands how to conjure an impression of richness than the Japanese. The brown suede panelling on the interior doorcards is an eccentric touch – and a discretionary one, since it’s optional. But even without it, the Seat’s cabin is the more upmarket.

It isn't necessarily the more pleasant, though – because airiness and space contribute plenty to that, and here the Subaru hits back. The Outback dominates this contest on space. It’s a car for grown-up families with big back seats, a wide load bay and lots of head room – and you can easily see that appealing to a customer who needs more from a car than a normal five-door can provide. The Leon does okay on practicality; its boot has a good loading length and its back seats are perfectly usable. But you wouldn’t call them roomy.

The Outback’s cabin fixtures and fittings, meanwhile, are far from disgraced on material quality. The Subaru’s switchgear is mostly the same as you’ll find in contemporary Japanese-built Toyotas – so it’s solid and robust, if a bit lacking in tactile appeal.

The swish-looking standard-fit multimedia system, meanwhile, is a bit of a turn-up for an otherwise functional but unadorned car. It looks more like an expensive piece of previous-century hi-fi equipment than a state-of-the-art smartphone – and as such, it’s a bit out of step with global trends on in-car entertainment design – but at least it looks premium.

It would be downright untrue to record that one of these cars roll, heaves and wallows when you drive it quickly and the other one doesn’t. Modern crossovers were, after all, conceived to be better to drive than that. But very few of them could match the crisp, direct on-road handling of the Leon X-Perience – and the Outback certainly doesn’t.

From behind the wheel, the Leon feels more like a hot diesel estate than a high-rise utility special. That’s partly because 15mm of extra ground clearance is pretty small potatoes, even for a modern crossover. But it’s mostly because the car has the same fast-paced steering and compact steering wheel as the standard hatchback, as well as the same taut body control and swift directional response.

If what you want is a crossover estate that handles like a Cupra diesel, you’ll probably love that. It certainly gives the Leon a more youthful, zesty kind of appeal than I expected.

But the Outback is the more comfortable family car, and much the more mature of the two. It rides with more compliance, and while it's marginally less grippy on the road and more reluctant to corner, it handles tidily and consistently - more than well enough to hold its end up. The Subaru handles as you expect it to, while the Leon is out to surprise - simple as that.

The performance levels feel quite even. Just as it’s the sportier prospect, so the Leon is also the slightly faster car of the two – but they’re more evenly matched on engine response and driveability.

Meanwhile, despite carrying a near-150kg kerb weight penalty, it’s the Outback that shades the contest on real-world fuel economy; circa-48mpg plays 45. On refinement, the Leon’s engine is the quieter at low crank speeds, but the Outback’s is the smoother-revving.

Which brings us to the bit that you may care disproportionally about if you’re a long-time resident of ‘crossover central’: how much more rugged are these cars than the family car norm? The answer, in one case, is quite a bit. In the other, you suspect the appearance of added ruggedness is all that really matters.

Regular towing and a bit of occasional service over a muddy field - that’s as tough as life is likely to get for most crossovers, I reckon. In light of which, the Subaru’s diff-based full-time four-wheel drive system – which gives it much more surefooted purchase on dirt than the Leon’s Haldex-type set-up – is probably a greater advantage than its considerably greater ground clearance.

The Outback’s traction is excellent. Parked on a steep, muddy incline, it’ll pull off without wasting more than the merest snatch of energy as wheelspin. It’d probably pull a double-axle caravan away from a boggy pitch just as casually. That’s the difference that proper diffs and hybrid off-road tyres make. The Leon’s 18in rims and sport tyres don’t generate nearly as much grip on the loose, and the four-wheel drive system doesn’t deliver power to the ground nearly as cleverly.

And on a forest track like the one on our test route, the Subaru’s advantage isn’t just about traction. The Outback’s softer-sprung, longer-travel chassis can take a reasonable-sized hit from a hidden rock and keeps all four wheels on the ground through troughs and over roots. It makes for a car with an appetite and an aptitude for light off-roading, that you can’t help but respond warmly to.

The Leon feels brittle and vulnerable should you make any attempt to follow the Subaru at the same pace: less stable and secure through the mud, more punishing over rougher surfaces. It's likely, I couldn’t help but imagine, to fall prone to anything from a puncture to a bashed sump at any time.

And the kicker in this section is in the technical specification.

While it’s actually rated to tow marginally less than the Leon on a braked trailer, the Outback will actually be the more useful tow car for an increasing proportion of UK drivers who haven’t taken a towing extension for their standard driving licence.

For that expanding chunk of the UK’s licence-holding population, a trailer can be no heavier than the car they’re towing it with – no matter what the car in question is rated for. The Subaru can therefore haul 1622kg; the Leon only 1484kg. And there are plenty of decent-sized caravans and trailers that, fully laden, would fall between those two stalls.

The verdict

I hate a conclusion with such an air of inevitability about it, but what this test boils down to is the lifestyle vehicle versus the real, 21st century utility car - and, given that they’re on offer at much the same price here, I’d defy anyone to pick the former over the latter.

The Subaru Outback just does more than the Seat Leon X-Perience - as a proper family car, tow car and an off-roader. There’s also a pleasing sense of predictability and an absence of meaningful compromise about the way it performs and handles on the road.

It feels like a big car – but a car rather than a lumbering 4x4. I’d have it with a CVT, because the torque multiplication would come in handy when towing, and because the boxer engine has the same penchant for stalling at low revs that all boxers seem to share - Porsche motors included. In a manual, I suspect your clutch would have a fairly hard life.

The Leon X-Perience, by contrast, ends up offering very little more than a normal Leon ST estate. That may be fine if all you want it is an all-paw wagon with a slightly raised seating position – but, for the money, you can have so much more.

It’s a car that’ll look the part carrying your mountain bikes all the way to the Snowdonian fells, but it’s certainly one to leave in the asphalt car park rather than to climb to the top of the burn in. Whatever the hell that is.

As one of Seat’s first forays into crossover design, it’s a respectable effort. But, as it turns out, there is a substitute for X-Perience where added-capability estate design is concerned - and, ironically enough, it’s experience with a small ‘x’.