Currently reading: Critics call Transport for the North £70bn route upgrades 'a fraud'

Upgrades include enlarging major west to east routes that connect Manchester with Leeds

Plans announced by Transport for the North (TfN) to upgrade commuter routes and major roads in the north of England have been called into question by critics.

John Prescott, former secretary of state for the environment, transport and the regions, described the project, in which the government is investing £69 billion over 30 years, as “a fraud”.

Prescott highlighted the fact that TfN can’t control its funding, which will arrive on average in £2.3bn lumps per year, in the same way Transport for London can. He said: “It was promised to have statutory powers. Now we know, and it's been confirmed by government, it will have no powers."

Prescott said TfN "can talk to the treasury along with the strategic bodies" but that "it can't make a decision and it doesn't get any money" without government input. This, critics claimed, could reduce the effectiveness of the project to have the biggest positive impact on the region.

Air pollution-absorbing canopies under consideration

TfN countered the claims by stating that it has enough power to "ensure plans are formally considered by government when taking decisions about transport investment in the north".

It said that the plans, which include creating a new road link from the M61 to M62 and building new carriageways in road sections that split Manchester and Leeds, could help generate 850,000 jobs and boost the economy by £100bn.

In total, TfN has identified seven ‘corridors’ of transport to improve in the north. These have been separated into sections, such as the Southern Pennines corridor, which will improve connections between the Port of Liverpool to the Humber Ports, via Cheshire, Greater Manchester and the Sheffield City Region.

TfN’s stategy will also include major rail upgrades to shorten journey times between the major cities of the north. The project is intended to “mobilise” the economy of the region and boost gross domestic product – which itself is aimed at rebalancing the UK economy to lessen the north/south divide.

More content

Opinion: the government is wrong to penalise diesel drivers

Advertisement

Read our review

Car review

The BMW 3 Series' outstanding performance and handling makes it a complete and consummate all-rounder - but then the Jaguar XE and Alfa Romeo Guilia arrived

Join the debate

Comments
4
Add a comment…
80sXS 18 January 2018

Is this part of the grand plan for the Northern Poorhouse?

You want to get the North moving? Simple. Build an 'M62 on rails', a modern trainline from Liverpool to Hull which stops at all of the major cities in its path.

Scoobman 18 January 2018

Simple solutions

80sXS wrote:

You want to get the North moving? Simple. Build an 'M62 on rails', a modern trainline from Liverpool to Hull which stops at all of the major cities in its path.

I agree, except for the word 'simple'. There's a big hill in the way.

Lapps 17 January 2018

Since when is Autocar a

Since when is Autocar a platform for a recycled Labour poly?

centenary 17 January 2018

Lapps wrote:

Lapps wrote:

Since when is Autocar a platform for a recycled Labour poly?

Last time I checked about 10 seconds ago, this 'Transport for the North' is Conservative pap. It will never happen and will be scaled back like all the other northern infrastructure upgrades once the tories have conned enough people to vote for them in the next election.