Car journalism: it can’t resist a good cliché. Among the top offenders is the notional ability of an assertive, long-snouted grand tourer to fire you to the Côte d’Azur ‘in one hit’.
One hit, you say? Blimey. It’s up there with ‘rifle-bolt’ shifts, ‘alacrity’ and the cursed ‘dab of oppo’.
Cliché or not, the point here is that the talent your flash GT has for shrinking the geography between Blighty and the Mediterranean Sea is, objectively speaking, less relevant now than ever before. A TGV train can hit 357mph; flights cost pennies. Cars themselves have also evolved.
In 1930, the contrast in appetite for big miles between a Bentley Blower and a Ford Model T was gaping; by 1965, standards had improved but horsepower and leather still counted. The attritional hit of six hours in an Aston Martin DB6, with its streamlined body, Selectaride dampers and 325bhp straight six, was massively less than in a Hillman Imp. The DB6, we said at the time, was for those needing “to travel far and fast”.
Today it’s a different story. Even a 15-year-old Volkswagen Golf TDI is considerably more relaxing than an oil-perfumed old Aston (which lacked even headrests). Up the ante to a new BMW 3 Series and you have a car so amply endowed with power and so serene at speed that it’s a prodigious GT in its own right.
It makes you wonder: in 2024, do the machines made and marketed on the undeniable allure of golden-age continental escapades still offer something unique when asked to fulfil the role? Or have they gone the same way as the horse: a nice plaything but essentially redundant?
The answer involves some opportunism on my part. For the facelifted Mercedes-Benz V-Class launch in Cannes, most UK journalists are getting there via Heathrow, but not me. My tool is a Bentley Continental GT in new-ish GT S guise – so it has the 542bhp 4.0-litre crossplane V8 and air springs of the regular car but a spicier diff, active anti-roll bars and sports exhaust.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Nice piece and a comfortable notch above the mostly overwritten dross on the automotive pseuds corner that is The Intercooler.
Still, it's a great pity that French autoroutes are now policed with such authoritarian zeal. Takes away pretty much all the appeal of such a journey.
Filling up with 90 litres of petrol!?! Given the inefficiency of combustion engines in real-world use (20-30%), that means at least 63 litres of that fuel was wasted as heat, while a maximum of 17 litres actually drove this vehicle down the road. And yet according to Autocar, we're supposed to appreciate combustion vehicles as examples of good engineering?
Made an account just to say how much I enjoyed this.
Proper, literary writing than should really be the aim of motoring journalists rather than boring repetition of statistics, droning on about 'primary ride' (whatever that is), or shouting on video