The 1990s wasn’t the friendliest environment for hot hatchbacks. The previous decade had bred some of the genre’s biggest icons, but an epidemic of thefts and spiralling insurance costs began to stifle car makers’ swagger.
The Golf GTI, a pioneer of the formula, was softened in its third generation, while the Escort Cosworth’s irresistibility to more than its paying customers meant Ford’s follow-ups lost their lustre too.
Thankfully, towards the decade’s close, rescue came from a reliable source of inexpensive fun: the French. The cars you see here were not only dinky in size and affordable, but their running costs were also attainable by everyday folk.
The Citroën Saxo VTS was flung to the top of the hot hatch sales charts by its now ludicrous-sounding free insurance deals, which, allied to its slim list price, lured in a younger demographic than that of the new car norm.
The Peugeot 106 GTi was a bit less bargain-bucket in its approach, but it is rumoured to have lowered its premiums another way. While the pair share the same genes, right down to identical four-cylinder engines, there was a minor gulf in their performance figures – chiefly the 106 taking half a second longer to hit 60mph than its non-identical twin.
The internet is awash with speculation about why that was the case, but the pair claim identical gear ratios, quelling any suggestions the Saxo could hit the accelerative benchmark with just one gearchange.
That only throws more weight behind the old wives’ theory that Peugeot started the stopwatch with more ballast on board in order to sandbag its car into a lower insurance group.
Either way, these are both joyously simple devices at their core. Each deploys a 120bhp 1.6-litre 16-valve naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine that is allied to a short-stacked five-speed manual gearbox and powering the front wheels bereft of complicated electronics or intelligent differential set-ups to interrupt the process. Their suspension set-ups are a mix of off-the-shelf struts, trailing arms and a torsion bar.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Few remarks about value for money including a Dacia costing 15k.
Well the opposite is in fact true, a new Pug 106 gti was 13k in 1997, well 13k in todays money is about 30k which would buy you a Polo Gti, a way better, faster, safer, bigger etc car.
Maybe cars aren't that expensive afterall.
I think we can all be guilty at times of comparing our salaries now with the price of cars 20+ years ago and thinking they sounded really cheap back in the good old days. I found an old bank statement from 1994 and I was earning about £15k a year gross after recently graduating.
So a 106 GTi brand new was almost a whole years salary. I so wanted one but never parted with the cash. Was cruising (!) around in a Nova 1.3L instead. Hmmm .....
Please compare apples to apples. What do think the average salary was in 1997?
It's as good a way of comparing apples to apples as any.
As to average salary, for what age group, sex, etc.
Great cars both of them - simple, light, nimble and affordable models with clean 3-door styling and no unnecessary frills. Shame there isn't a modern equivalent though the Up GTi came close.